A Tale of Two Theorems
Samskrith Raghav
I wrote this poem after reading the book FERMAT'S LAST THEOREM by Simon Singh; It's a fine book, and it reads like a suspense thriller. I highly recommend you read the book!
We begin our tale with Fermat, a Frenchman
You can say he was half a mathematician
One day he was working and then he was thinking
Of a statement which would send the world sinking:
“The square of a plus the square of b
Always will equal the whole square of c
But by try to cube it or do anything larger
You’ll leave without ever getting any smarter.”
He said he had proof, just like all the others:
All of this claim’s big sisters and brothers
But he had an excuse when people came chargin’
“Such a marvelous proof wouldn’t fit in the margin.”
So the math-hunt began, to find this new proof
To affirm of a conviction or find a disproof
But no one found proof for a word that he said
So Fermat would find himself undefeated
For centuries men worked, and women too
All the people that toiled numbered more than just two
But it proved much too great for the best of the best
And many a person had to put it to rest
But out the blue came two bright young minds
From Japan they were just two of a kind
They knew that one maths was linked to another
But they had no proof to satisfy others
Now maths had new tools to attack this old problem
But no one could think how exactly to use them
And slowly the people stopped paying attention
While only one man kept up his obsession
When Andrew Wiles was just a young lad
He read of Fermat’s long lost theorem
His attention was captured; he was so enraptured
He knew he would solve this great problem
For many long years, he toiled and stumbled
Not knowing how to approach such a problem
But he kept up his without any grumble
He resumed secret work on the conundrum
He tried and he tried with one kind of theory
But his efforts yielded no answers
Then he remembered the two students’ story
And refused to quit ‘til he mastered
He again began toiling to find a pathway
On how to prove this new conjecture
He worked and he worked and he knew it so well
He could even deliver a lecture
In Spring, there was a math conference
At Cambridge, where Wiles was heading
He arranged for some lectures with very vague names
Unknown to him, dangers were lurking
He announced the proof to applause and fanfare
During summer the smarts reviewed it
They found a small, fundamental flaw
Which set back Wiles to the end of his wit
Wiles began toiling and working again
But this time he made no progress
The world waited for his great big proof,
But Wiles was now in distress
Wiles worked for one year and almost gave up
But a friend decided to help him
One day he was thinking and then he realized
The great flaw that made him so grim
He reversed his course and went back to a theory
He had tried and failed to employ
He employed his new work on new forms of math
And soon the problem he destroyed
And so ends the tale of Fermat, a Frenchman
Whose puzzle was solved at Princeton
Three fifty years of stress and work later
We can say, “that puzzle’s been done.”
Comments
Post a Comment